All listings for this product
Best-selling in Non-Fiction Books
Save on Non-Fiction Books
- AU $47.31Trending at AU $49.44
- AU $77.99Trending at AU $116.29
- AU $28.57Trending at AU $31.02
- AU $70.08Trending at AU $77.15
- AU $74.33Trending at AU $76.94
- AU $35.43Trending at AU $39.03
- AU $27.17Trending at AU $37.56
About this product
- DescriptionThis collection of essays showcases recent work on Hume and the Is/Ought question. There are four distinct attempts to redefine and prove Hume's No-Ought-From-Is thesis in such a way as to evade the famous counterexamples of A.N. Prior. The rival approaches are explained and discussed together with their implications for meta-ethical theory.
- Author BiographyCHARLES PIGDEN is Senior Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of Otago, New Zealand. He has published on a wide range of topics from conspiracy theories to the reality of numbers. He is a meta-ethicist with special interests in Russell, Moore and Hume. He is the editor of Hume on Motivation and Virtue in the Palgrave Macmillan Series Philosophers in Depth.
- PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
- Date of Publication21/07/2010
- Place of PublicationBasingstoke
- Country of PublicationUnited Kingdom
- ImprintPalgrave Macmillan
- Content Noteblack & white illustrations
- Weight572 g
- Width140 mm
- Height216 mm
- Spine20 mm
- Edited byCharles R. Pigden
- Format DetailsLaminated cover
This item doesn't belong on this page.
Thanks, we'll look into this.