Terrorism, Government, and Law: National Authority and Local Autonomy in the War on Terror by ABC-CLIO (Microfilm, 2008)
Brand newLOWEST PRICE
- AU $205.75+ postage
- Brand new condition
- Sold by booktopia_australia
- See details for delivery est.
- AU $25.95+ AU $29.00 postage
- Very good condition
- Sold by ausreseller
- See details for delivery est.
All listings for this product
Best-selling in Non-Fiction Books
Save on Non-Fiction Books
- AU $9.86Trending at AU $16.84
- AU $11.51Trending at AU $18.82
- AU $24.83Trending at AU $25.31
- AU $64.07Trending at AU $74.95
- AU $28.70Trending at AU $37.00
- AU $44.73Trending at AU $47.15
- AU $25.61Trending at AU $28.26
About this product
- DescriptionIf the FBI asks local law enforcement agencies to interrogate Arab and Muslim men within their jurisdictions, may the Detroit Chief of Police decline to do so? Would allowing the federal government to insist on local assistance be an example of undesirable federal overreaching or desirable national uniformity? If the FBI engages in a Joint Terrorism Task Force with local law enforcement officials in Portland, Oregon, may Portland police officers igre surveillance-limiting Oregon state laws that apply to them, but t to the FBI? May those officers be bound to secrecy and prohibited from telling their employers if their colleagues violate state law? If the city of Arcata, California, disapproves of powers the USA Patriot Act gives federal investigators, may it prohibit its law enforcement personnel from helping the FBI conduct investigations? Concern about the proper balance between federal and local authority reaches back to the founding of our nation. That discussion has been re-ignited by the shock waves generated on September 11, 2001, which profoundly challenged our understandings of various constitutional strategies established to prevent overreaching by the Federal government. Until w, the discussion about the impact of 9/11 on American law has paid little attention to federalism, a vertical check on the federal government that complements the horizontal checks created by the separation of powers of the legislative, judicial, and executive branches. Questions about the ability of state and local governments to make their own policy choices form an important subset of questions about how far the federal government can or should go in its antiterrorism efforts. Clashes between claims of national authority and claims of local automy raise political questions that play out within a framework of constitutional law. Terrorism, Government, and LaW is designed to foster an important national conversation on this subject.
- Author BiographySusan N. Herman is Centennial Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School. She is the author of The Right to a Speedy and Public Trial: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution (Praeger, 2006), sections of other books, and many law review articles. Paul Finkelman is President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law and Public Policy and Senior Fellow in the Government Law Center at Albany Law School. He is the author of many books, including Slavery and the Founders: Race and Liberty in the Age of Jefferson, Dred Scott v. Sandford: A Brief History with Documents, and A March of Liberty: A Constitutional History of the United States (with Mel Urofsky).
- Date of Publication30/04/2008
- SubjectLaw: General & Reference
- Series TitlePraeger Security International
- Place of PublicationWestport
- Country of PublicationUnited States
- ImprintGreenwood Press
- Content Noteblack & white illustrations
- Weight481 g
- Width166 mm
- Height235 mm
- Spine22 mm
- Edited byChapman Distinguished Professor of Law Paul Finkelman,Paul Finkelman,President of ACLU and Professor of Law Susan N Herman,Susan N. Herman
This item doesn't belong on this page.
Thanks, we'll look into this.