Picture 1 of 1

Stock photo

Helvetica and the New York City Subway System : The True (Maybe) Story by... - Picture 1 of 1

Helvetica and the New York City Subway System : The True (Maybe) Story by Paul Shaw (2011, Hardcover)

5.01 product rating

Awardlink (1026)

90% positive feedback

Price:

US $39.60

ApproximatelyAU $61.17

+ $18.07 postage

Estimated delivery Thu, 21 Aug - Mon, 1 Sep

Returns:

30-day returns. Buyer pays for return postage. If you use an eBay postage label, it will be deducted from your refund amount.

Condition:

Brand new

About this product

Product Identifiers

PublisherMIT Press

ISBN-10026201548X

ISBN-139780262015486

eBay Product ID (ePID)10038757005

Product Key Features

Book TitleHelvetica and the New York City Subway System : the True (Maybe) Story

Number of Pages144 Pages

LanguageEnglish

Publication Year2011

TopicHistory & Criticism, Public Transportation, Graphic Arts / Typography, Advertising & Promotion

IllustratorYes

FeaturesNew Edition

GenreDesign, Transportation, Business & Economics

AuthorPaul Shaw

FormatHardcover

Dimensions

Item Height0.7 in

Item Weight36.8 Oz

Item Length11.4 in

Item Width9.8 in

Additional Product Features

Intended AudienceTrade

LCCN2010-039985

Dewey Edition22

ReviewsA concise history of the New York subway, a visual archive of century's worth of underground signs (some of which are still in use), and an impressive study of the conflict between the purity of design and the messiness of the real world., "A concise history of the New York subway, a visual archive of century's worth of underground signs (some of which are still in use), and an impressive study of the conflict between the purity of design and the messiness of the real world." The Wilson Quarterly, "[D]esign projects are rarely tidy; they're much likelier to be muddled, chaotic, and to be determined by flukes, gaffes and compromises as much as forethought. It's always refreshing to come across an unexpurgated account of the messy reality, and the American design historian Paul Shaw has produced a particularly thoughtful and engaging example in his new book, Helvetica and the New York City Subway System ." -- Alice Rawsthorn The New York Times, "Mr. Shaw makes clear in one of the best-researched books on modern design to date, this most New York of places is today a realm dominated by a Swiss typeface specified by a pair of Italian designers. There isn't better testimony to the city as a melting pot or to the strange turns that any major design project inevitably takes." -- The Wall Street Journal, "[D]esign projects are rarely tidy; they're much likelier to be muddled, chaotic, and to be determined by flukes, gaffes and compromises as much as forethought. It's always refreshing to come across an unexpurgated account of the messy reality, and the American design historian Paul Shaw has produced a particularly thoughtful and engaging example in his new book, Helvetica and the New York City Subway System ." Alice Rawsthorn The New York Times, "[D]esign projects are rarely tidy; they're much likelier to be muddled,chaotic, and to be determined by flukes, gaffes and compromises as much as forethought. It's alwaysrefreshing to come across an unexpurgated account of the messy reality, and the American designhistorian Paul Shaw has produced a particularly thoughtful and engaging example in his new book, Helvetica and the New York City Subway System ." -- AliceRawsthorn The New York Times, A concise history of the New York subway, a visual archive of century's worth of underground signs (some of which are still in use), and an impressive study of the conflict between the purity of design and the messiness of the real world.-- The Wilson Quarterly -- [D]esign projects are rarely tidy; they're much likelier to be muddled, chaotic, and to be determined by flukes, gaffes and compromises as much as forethought. It's always refreshing to come across an unexpurgated account of the messy reality, and the American design historian Paul Shaw has produced a particularly thoughtful and engaging example in his new book, Helvetica and the New York City Subway System . -- Alice Rawsthorn , The New York Times -- Mr. Shaw makes clear in one of the best-researched books on modern design to date, this most New York of places is today a realm dominated by a Swiss typeface specified by a pair of Italian designers. There isn't better testimony to the city as a melting pot or to the strange turns that any major design project inevitably takes. -- The Wall Street Journal --, "Mr. Shaw makes clear in one of the best-researched books on modern design to date, this most New York of places is today a realm dominated by a Swiss typeface specified by a pair of Italian designers. There isn't better testimony to the city as a melting pot or to the strange turns that any major design project inevitably takes." The Wall Street Journal, Mr. Shaw makes clear in one of the best-researched books on modern design to date, this most New York of places is today a realm dominated by a Swiss typeface specified by a pair of Italian designers. There isn't better testimony to the city as a melting pot or to the strange turns that any major design project inevitably takes., "A concise history of the New York subway, a visual archive of century's worth of underground signs (some of which are still in use), and an impressive study of the conflict between the purity of design and the messiness of the real world." -- The Wilson Quarterly, "Mr. Shaw makes clear in one of the best-researched books on modern design todate, this most New York of places is today a realm dominated by a Swiss typeface specified by apair of Italian designers. There isn't better testimony to the city as a melting pot or to thestrange turns that any major design project inevitably takes." -- The Wall StreetJournal, "A concise history of the New York subway, a visual archive of century's worthof underground signs (some of which are still in use), and an impressive study of the conflictbetween the purity of design and the messiness of the real world." -- The WilsonQuarterly, [D]esign projects are rarely tidy; they're much likelier to be muddled, chaotic, and to be determined by flukes, gaffes and compromises as much as forethought. It's always refreshing to come across an unexpurgated account of the messy reality, and the American design historian Paul Shaw has produced a particularly thoughtful and engaging example in his new book, Helvetica and the New York City Subway System .

Grade FromCollege Graduate Student

Dewey Decimal686.2/24

Edition DescriptionNew Edition

SynopsisShakespeare for Screenwriters is the first book to use Shakespearee(tm)s works to examine the fundamentals of screenwriting. The book offers insight into what makes Shakespearee(tm)s creations so powerful by analyzing the timeless themes in his greatest works and translating them into practical writing advice. Geared to all levels of interest and experience in both Shakespeare and screenwriting, each chapter focuses on specific lessons learned through reading Shakespeare. William Shakespeare wrote the most powerful dramas in the English language. Shakespeare for Screenwriters tells you how., How New York City subways signage evolved from a "visual mess" to a uniform system with Helvetica triumphant. For years, the signs in the New York City subway system were a bewildering hodge-podge of lettering styles, sizes, shapes, materials, colors, and messages. The original mosaics (dating from as early as 1904), displaying a variety of serif and sans serif letters and decorative elements, were supplemented by signs in terracotta and cut stone. Over the years, enamel signs identifying stations and warning riders not to spit, smoke, or cross the tracks were added to the mix. Efforts to untangle this visual mess began in the mid-1960s, when the city transit authority hired the design firm Unimark International to create a clear and consistent sign system. We can see the results today in the white-on-black signs throughout the subway system, displaying station names, directions, and instructions in crisp Helvetica. This book tells the story of how typographic order triumphed over chaos. The process didn't go smoothly or quickly. At one point New York Times architecture writer Paul Goldberger declared that the signs were so confusing one almost wished that they weren't there at all. Legend has it that Helvetica came in and vanquished the competition. Paul Shaw shows that it didn't happen that way--that, in fact, for various reasons (expense, the limitations of the transit authority sign shop), the typeface overhaul of the 1960s began not with Helvetica but with its forebear, Standard (AKA Akzidenz Grotesk). It wasn't until the 1980s and 1990s that Helvetica became ubiquitous. Shaw describes the slow typographic changeover (supplementing his text with more than 250 images--photographs, sketches, type samples, and documents). He places this signage evolution in the context of the history of the New York City subway system, of 1960s transportation signage, of Unimark International, and of Helvetica itself., How New York City subways signage evolved from a "visual mess" to a uniform system with Helvetica triumphant. For years, the signs in the New York City subway system were a bewildering hodge-podge of lettering styles, sizes, shapes, materials, colors, and messages. The original mosaics (dating from as early as 1904), displaying a variety of serif and sans serif letters and decorative elements, were supplemented by signs in terracotta and cut stone. Over the years, enamel signs identifying stations and warning riders not to spit, smoke, or cross the tracks were added to the mix. Efforts to untangle this visual mess began in the mid-1960s, when the city transit authority hired the design firm Unimark International to create a clear and consistent sign system. We can see the results today in the white-on-black signs throughout the subway system, displaying station names, directions, and instructions in crisp Helvetica. This book tells the story of how typographic order triumphed over chaos. The process didn't go smoothly or quickly. At one point New York Times architecture writer Paul Goldberger declared that the signs were so confusing one almost wished that they weren't there at all. Legend has it that Helvetica came in and vanquished the competition. Paul Shaw shows that it didn't happen that way-that, in fact, for various reasons (expense, the limitations of the transit authority sign shop), the typeface overhaul of the 1960s began not with Helvetica but with its forebear, Standard (AKA Akzidenz Grotesk). It wasn't until the 1980s and 1990s that Helvetica became ubiquitous. Shaw describes the slow typographic changeover (supplementing his text with more than 250 images-photographs, sketches, type samples, and documents). He places this signage evolution in the context of the history of the New York City subway system, of 1960s transportation signage, of Unimark International, and of Helvetica itself.

LC Classification NumberZ250.5.H45S53 2011