|Listed in category:
Have one to sell?

Tempered Glass Screen Protector Guard Shield Saver For Samsung Galaxy Tablet

Condition:
Brand New
More than 10 available / 635 sold
Price:
US $9.99
ApproximatelyAU $15.03
This one's trending. 635 have already sold.
Breathe easy. Free delivery and returns.
Postage:
Free Standard Shipping. See detailsfor delivery
Located in: Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Mon, 10 Jun and Wed, 12 Jun to 43230
Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the postage service selected, the seller's postage history, and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Returns:
30-day returns. Seller pays for return postage. See details- for more information about returns
Payments:
     

Shop with confidence

eBay Money Back Guarantee
Get the item you ordered or your money back. 

Seller information

Registered as a business seller
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:332003760568
Last updated on 24 Feb, 2022 15:31:20 AEDSTView all revisionsView all revisions

Item specifics

Condition
Brand New: A brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging (where packaging ...
Compatible Product Line
Galaxy Tablet
Compatible Brand
Samsung
Features
HD Clear, Tempered Glass, Anti-Scratch
MPN
347777942309
Brand
Unbranded/Generic
Type
Screen Protector

Item description from the seller

xtrong

xtrong

94.5% positive Feedback
169K items sold
Joined Oct 2015

Detailed seller ratings

Average for the last 12 months

Accurate description
4.8
Reasonable postage costs
5.0
Postage speed
4.6
Communication
4.7

Seller Feedback (36,947)

e***o (592)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Great product fast shipping
e***o (282)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Super eBay seller, A+++++++
2***p (601)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
This item is very useful and is on point.
See all Feedback