Dewey Edition22
Reviews"Required reading for anyone who wishes to debate the need for federal civil justice reform." --Theodore Frank, resident fellow and director, Liability Project, American Enterprise Institute, "[Discusses] how the legal system has been perverted to enrich some litigators at the expense of everyone in our society." --Roger E. Meiners, professor of economics and law, University of Texas-Arlington, "Helland and Tabarrok provide a superb and pioneering examination of the litigation nightmare in the United States." --Paul H. Rubin, professor of economics and law, Emory University, "ÝDiscusses¨ how the legal system has been perverted to enrich some litigators at the expense of everyone in our society." --Roger E. Meiners, professor of economics and law, University of Texas-Arlington, "Helland and Tabarrok provide a superb and pioneering examination of the litigation nightmare in the United States." -Paul H. Rubin, professor of economics and law, Emory University, "Helland and Tabarrok provide a superb and pioneering examination of the litigation nightmare in the United States." —Paul H. Rubin, professor of economics and law, Emory University, "Required reading for anyone who wishes to debate the need for federal civil justice reform." -Theodore Frank, resident fellow and director, Liability Project, American Enterprise Institute, "[Discusses] how the legal system has been perverted to enrich some litigators at the expense of everyone in our society." --Roger E. Meiners, professor of economics and law, University of Texas-Arlington, "Required reading for anyone who wishes to debate the need for federal civil justice reform." -Theodore Frank, resident fellow and director, Liability Project, American Enterprise Institute, "[Discusses] how the legal system has been perverted to enrich some litigators at the expense of everyone in our society." -Roger E. Meiners, professor of economics and law, University of TexasArlington, "Clear, forcefully argued and highly accessible." --Walter K. Olson, senior fellow, Manhattan Institute, "Helland and Tabarrok provide a superb and pioneering examination of the litigation nightmare in the United States." -Paul H. Rubin, professor of economics and law, Emory University, "Helland and Tabarrok provide a superb and pioneering examination of the litigation nightmare in the United States." --Paul H. Rubin, professor of economics and law, Emory University, "[Discusses] how the legal system has been perverted to enrich some litigators at the expense of everyone in our society." -Roger E. Meiners, professor of economics and law, University of TexasArlington, "Clear, forcefully argued and highly accessible." --Walter K. Olson, senior fellow, Manhattan Institute, "[Discusses] how the legal system has been perverted to enrich some litigators at the expense of everyone in our society." —Roger E. Meiners, professor of economics and law, University of Texas--Arlington, "Clear, forcefully argued and highly accessible." -Walter K. Olson, senior fellow, Manhattan Institute, "Required reading for anyone who wishes to debate the need for federal civil justice reform." —Theodore Frank, resident fellow and director, Liability Project, American Enterprise Institute, "Clear, forcefully argued and highly accessible." —Walter K. Olson, senior fellow, Manhattan Institute, "Required reading for anyone who wishes to debate the need for federal civil justice reform." --Theodore Frank, resident fellow and director, Liability Project, American Enterprise Institute, "Clear, forcefully argued and highly accessible." -Walter K. Olson, senior fellow, Manhattan Institute
SynopsisIs the U.S. tort system in crisis? CBS television's 60 Minutes has said the tort system metes out "jackpot justice," and Newsweek has called America a "Lawsuit Hell." Other observers of the legal system, however, argue that the tort crisis is a myth. Although both sides of the debate rely primarily on anecdote and the selective use of evidence, a sound diagnosis of the tort system requires a rigorous analysis of hard data, not a retelling of sensationalistic sound bites. In Judge and Jury: American Tort Law on Trial , economists Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok present their study of tens of thousands of tort cases from across the United States. The result is the most complete picture of the U.S. system of civil justice to date. Examining three of the key players of the tort system (juries, judges, and lawyers), Helland and Tabarrok conclude that the tort system is badly broken in some respects but functions surprisingly well in others., With inordinate amounts of money spent in the United States on lawyers and lawsuits and multi-billion-dollar settlements growing each year, the very timely book Judge and Jury asks, "Is the tort system benefiting the public?" In Judge and Jury , the fear of litigation is shown to reduce innovations, drive physicians and manufacturers out of lawsuit-prone specialties, and increase manufacturing and consumer costs. In the courts, data from thousands of cases all over the country demonstrate that tort system awards are driven by political factors such as judicial elections, jury compositions, and the location of courts themselves. This book assembles the unprecedented findings and insights by authors Eric Helland Alexander Tabarrok, who have pioneered economic and legal research into the injustice and enormous costs created by the politicization of the tort law. Seeking to reverse the extremely harmful trends in tort law, Judge and Jury assembles innovative alternatives for reforming the tort system and charts a course toward re-establishing fair civil justice for all in the United States., Economists Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok present their study of tens of thousands of tort cases from across the US. The result is the most complete picture of the US system of civil justice to date. Examining three of the key players of the tort system, Helland and Tabarrok conclude that the tort system is badly broken in some respects but functions surprisingly well in others., Is the U.S. tort system in crisis? CBS television's 60 Minutes has said the tort system metes out jackpot justice, and Newsweek has called America a Lawsuit Hell. Other observers of the legal system, however, argue that the tort crisis is a myth. Although both sides of the debate rely primarily on anecdote and the selective use of evidence, a sound diagnosis of the tort system requires a rigorous analysis of hard data, not a retelling of sensationalistic sound bites. In Judge and Jury: American Tort Law on Trial , economists Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok present their study of tens of thousands of tort cases from across the United States. The result is the most complete picture of the U.S. system of civil justice to date. Examining three of the key players of the tort system (juries, judges, and lawyers), Helland and Tabarrok conclude that the tort system is badly broken in some respects but functions surprisingly well in others.
LC Classification NumberKF1251.H45 2005