atrina on eBay

About

Location: AustraliaMember since: 06 December 2001

Feedback ratings

Last 12 months

Positive46- positive feedback in last 12 months

Neutral0- neutral feedback in last 12 months

Negative0- negative feedback in last 12 months

All feedback (355)

i-selection (102569)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Good buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
mabelri4- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Good buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
*****- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
.•:*¨¨*:•..•:* ABSOLUTELY STELLAR EBAYER*:•..•:*¨¨*:•.
autobarn-au (8520)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
Quick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
*****- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
Hope to see you again. Thank you for your custom. Superspares - 5 stars
sparesbox_auto (528223)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
Thank you for shopping with Spares Box. Highly recommend, valued customer.

See all feedback

Reviews (1)

Synology DS220j DiskStation 2-Bay NAS - Diskless (Replace DS218j)

20 May 2021

Frustrating with unintuitive defaults that will confuse you and waste your time

If you're expecting this device to be simple and intuitive, you will be disappointed and worse frustrated. I initially installed 1 HDD and noticed that the files I copied onto it consumed twice the disk space I expected. I couldn't find a good explanation of SHR (their RAID) that answered the question of what it did on a single disk and assumed it had made redundant copies. So I added another drive. And found I still had no more disk space. 2Tb was consuming 8 Tb of physical disk space. Is that what you want? By default, hidden in options - it created another version of every file I copied which initially doubled the disk space. Then, adding the second disk, it made a redundant copy in case of drive failure. Now the second part was expected (RAID). The first was not. Apparently this is 'helpful' for some people. It's called 'versioning' - but it's more correctly DiskSpaceWaste(TM). It's flawed for 2 reasons. First it should not be on by default, Second it not make copies of files before they're modified - essentially duplicating the files independent of RAID. It's comically bad and indefensible. Sure - offer versioning but don't have it on by default and don't make extra versions until something changes.

See all reviews