About
All feedback (64)
- bolensparts-360 (17542)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseThanks for your business
- mycase2015 (13585)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
- ezvacuums (52523)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseHope to deal with you again. Thank you.
- ameribox (191868)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseHope to deal with you again. Thank you.
- jex-electronics-usa (85799)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseThis customer ROCKS! Please leave 5 stars! (Any problems email)
- *****- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseHope to deal with you again. Thank you.
Reviews (1)

05 September 2024
Since it’s a smaller diameter, my bet is it fails sooner then original
This cord sent is .025”-.040” less in width which is of great concern for longevity compared to the original cord as mic’ed w a caliper and also can be felt by hand. Thus, why is it not the same diameter was a smaller roll used here to save money but failure will be sooner?