About
All feedback (43)
- 3c_photography (1600)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, Hope to deal again with you!
- *****- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- insdinen (8286)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- p2works_japan (1353)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- einfinityshop4 (5457)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- *****- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.☆ありがとうございます！
Reviews (2)
26 January 2022
What it is is a $70US lens. Not the sharpest lens around, but entirely adequate. See pics.
Not a bad lens, and surely worth every bit of the ~$70US I paid for it. I would have been much less happy had I paid $250-300US for a new one. Things not to like: 1: It's APS-C only, and not full frame; 2:It's not "internal focus," so gets longer when it's zoomed. Almost twice as long. (See first two pics.) 3: The zoom ring is sticky. Which is much better than a loose zoom barrel, of course. 4.It lacks an aperture ring. This means less control, unable to use the lens on other cameras using cheap adapters, and faint concern about whether my K-70 aperture control block will ever fail. 5:It's "all plasticky," though the plastic doesn't really feel "cheap;" 6:Even the lens mount is plastic, and not metal. Some comments out there in the world suggest that the plastic mount can wear, but again, the lens I bought is used, and the mount looks plenty OK to me. (Even so, the DAL mount is plastic, but there is a DA version of the lens with a metal mount.) 7:Autofocus is noisy. Probably the noisiest autofocus lens I have.That said, it =does= have autofocus! Summary: In my case, what it is is a $70US lens. It is not the sharpest lens around, but much better than say, a Sony 55-210. Seems it could be sharper, but generally sharp enough. I am not disappointed, though I had hoped it would work better for astrophotography things.
04 December 2019
Good camera
Probably the best full frame value available at this time. It would be better if it had a zoom lever for use while shooting video, instead of menu only zoom support.