About
All feedback (18)
- t***q (20347)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseA+ transaction
- 3***r (984)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaselen it very nice . fast shipping
- t***s (282)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseShipped quickly. In perfect, unused condition. Thanks!
- f.128 (7128)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
- hitexstore (130801)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
- w6fv435 (-1)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchase9/10
Reviews (1)
04 November 2020
Better than the Canon 135 L f2 but at a price
It's a heavy lens compared to the Canon version. The autofocus is faster than the Canon 135 L f2 and the images are sharper. Image quality and color are quite good on Canon version. It's expensive compared to its Canon counterpart but not a terrible value overall. I use it on a Canon R5 and R6 with excellent results. Overall it is better than the Canon 135 L f2 but heavier and more expensive. It's hard to say whether it is so much better to justify the price differential. The Canon 135 is one of the better regarded L lenses in the Canon lines. For sports the Sigma Art version will likely produce better results with its advantage in sharpness and autofocus speed.