About
All feedback (15)
- t***q (19900)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseA+ transaction
- 3***r (979)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaselen it very nice . fast shipping
- t***s (279)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseShipped quickly. In perfect, unused condition. Thanks!
- eBay automated Feedback- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthOrder completed successfully – tracked and on time
- finickymilk87 (523)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseGreat buyer!
- grandeagleretail (943909)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseExcellent buyer! Hope to deal with you again. Thanks!
Reviews (1)
04 November 2020
Better than the Canon 135 L f2 but at a price
It's a heavy lens compared to the Canon version. The autofocus is faster than the Canon 135 L f2 and the images are sharper. Image quality and color are quite good on Canon version. It's expensive compared to its Canon counterpart but not a terrible value overall. I use it on a Canon R5 and R6 with excellent results. Overall it is better than the Canon 135 L f2 but heavier and more expensive. It's hard to say whether it is so much better to justify the price differential. The Canon 135 is one of the better regarded L lenses in the Canon lines. For sports the Sigma Art version will likely produce better results with its advantage in sharpness and autofocus speed.