About
All feedback (723)
- petersofkensington (217335)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, valued customer, highly recommended. Thanks Peters of Kensington
- greatideas001 (46587)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
- jwl8424 (9374)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
- timepiececentral (179)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
- eplus20201 (4018)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseThanks a lot, hope you had a great shopping experience. much regards.
- midwayaustralia (63351)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
Reviews (5)
04 December 2012
Recommended as one of the best standard zooms for Micro Four Third cameras
I purchased the Panasonic 14-45 after researching standard zoom lenses that provide best results for a reasonable cost.
Despite the lens being one of the original Micro Four Third lenses, the Panasonic 14-45 is somewhat better than most of it's competition, including the newer Panasonic 14-42, All olympus 14-42 variants, and indeed, barring a slightly more limited focal length, better image quality still than the newer Olympus 12-50 lens that is sold with many OM-D E-M5's.
Along with the general consensus, I find this lens to provide sharper images than it's competition. It well built, looks nice, and adhering to the Micro Four Thirds standard, works perfectly on every Micro Four Thirds camera I have tried it on.
28 September 2017
Basic and functional at a decent price
I found the build quality only reasonable, with lightweight and cheap feelings plastics all round. The light function is great however. The movement while sweeping can still be heard, though not as bad as a ticking clock. Overall, it was worth the under $20AUD I paid for it. I don't think it would be such good value if it cost more, even with the Seiko name.
27 June 2019
Practical & Value at the right price
I paid $18 for this knife, and can’t complain. It’s reasonably solid and sharp. It’s opening and closing isn’t very smooth, so one handed opening isn’t the easiest, but just ok. The bottle opener doesn’t effect holding, but can be uncomfortable if putting your hand in the same pocket if you snag the bottle opener with your hand. I’d still recommend it as long as your aware of these couple of deficits. I wouldn’t pay much more than I did, otherwise there are definitely better small knives out there. Some of which are also Kershaw brand.