About
All feedback (1,063)
- g***g (127)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseThe pair of bi-wire cable arrived as listed. The shipping was timely and they worked as they should. The value was on par with other models of this vintage and condition. The only thing of note, was the packing smelled a bit of smoke, but that dissipated quickly.
- *****- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
- tci_surplus (7486)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchase✭✭GREAT COMMUNICATION A PLEASURE TO DO BUSINESS WITH! TINCANINDUSTRIES.COM✭✭
- yovus (291793)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction.Excellent buyer. A++++++.
- demra24 (1788)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
- industrialgaragesales (4380)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
Reviews (4)
19 March 2017
I use a lot of these
I sell LED flashlights, and I use these for the pull-up compact LED strip/COB 300Lm lanterns. My testing showed that my lanterns were still going strong after 8 hours with these batteries. My customers like that I include batteries and love that I use these.
I have bought at least 300 of these from BHN Supply so far. Shipping was fast and the quality has been consistently good.
13 July 2010
What a steal!
This is a nice lens for what it is made for. The VR on it is amazing. The other day the GF wanted a picture of a poster in a fairly dark bar. I shot 2 with the flash, and to test the VR, 5 without. I figured of the 5 I'd get one good one. Nope. I got 5 good ones, all razor sharp. Color me impressed.
It is a lot narrower on the bottom end than my 28-200 non-VR Nikon lens. I will be getting a VR 18-55 lens to fill the wide angle needs. The upside to all of this is a lot less distortion long and short, better sub-55mm pictures, faster focusing, and of course the VR. By not going that extra 28mm on the wide end it is a far superior lens.
The auto focus works well. I shoot action sports (whitewater) as a pro. The average shoot is between 400-700 pictures taken in pretty rapid succession. The old 28-200 non-VR lens would bring home the action, but there were always a few key pictures on every trip that the auto focus would get tricked by flying water droplets on a hard wave smash that would throw off the focus. Last weekend in 6 different shoots totaling about 3,000 images, it brought home exactly one blurry picture, and it was probably my fault. Accurate to 0.03%? $130? I am a very happy guy.
I got this lens as a refurb for about $130. It was every bit as nice as any of the new Nikon glass that I have bought over the years, and for a sharp VR lens like this it is a total steal. You can also pick up a refurb 18-55VR lens, like I will this week, for about $100 to compliment it for wide angle and indoor stuff.
What would make it better? Maybe making it a F2.8 for $130 or having Angelena Jolie deliver it, but short of that it is a very nice lens and a total steal. Props to Cameta for having it in my hands halfway across the country in 36 hours too.
13 July 2010
What a steal!
This is a nice lens for what it is made for. The VR on it is amazing. The other day the GF wanted a picture of a poster in a fairly dark bar. I shot 2 with the flash, and to test the VR, 5 without. I figured of the 5 I'd get one good one. Nope. I got 5 good ones, all razor sharp. Color me impressed.
It is a lot narrower on the bottom end than my 28-200 non-VR Nikon lens. I will be getting a VR 18-55 lens to fill the wide angle needs. The upside to all of this is a lot less distortion long and short, better sub-55mm pictures, faster focusing, and of course the VR. By not going that extra 28mm on the wide end it is a far superior lens.
The auto focus works well. I shoot action sports (whitewater) as a pro. The average shoot is between 400-700 pictures taken in pretty rapid succession. The old 28-200 non-VR lens would bring home the action, but there were always a few key pictures on every trip that the auto focus would get tricked by flying water droplets on a hard wave smash that would throw off the focus. Last weekend in 6 different shoots totaling about 3,000 images, it brought home exactly one blurry picture, and it was probably my fault. Accurate to 0.03%? $130? I am a very happy guy.
I got this lens as a refurb for about $130. It was every bit as nice as any of the new Nikon glass that I have bought over the years, and for a sharp VR lens like this it is a total steal. You can also pick up a refurb 18-55VR lens, like I will this week, for about $100 to compliment it for wide angle and indoor stuff.
What would make it better? Maybe making it a F2.8 for $130 or having Angelena Jolie deliver it, but short of that it is a very nice lens and a total steal. Props to Cameta for having it in my hands halfway across the country in 36 hours too.